Supreme Court docket says leaked abortion draft is genuine; Roberts orders investigation into leak

Pro-abortion and anti-abortion demonstrators protest exterior the U.S. Supreme Courtroom after the leak of a draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito preparing for a majority of the courtroom to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion rights resolution later this 12 months, in Washington, U.S., Might 3, 2022. 

Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on Tuesday confirmed the authenticity of a leaked draft court docket opinion that would toss out longstanding abortion rights, but famous that is not the court docket's final choice.

Roberts ordered an investigation into the leaker.

"To the extent this betrayal of the confidences of the Court was intended to undermine the integrity of our operations, it won't succeed," the chief justice said in an announcement. "The work of the Courtroom won't be affected in any way."

"I have directed the Marshal of the Courtroom to launch an investigation into the supply of the leak," Roberts said.

The advance publication of a draft opinion is just about unprecedented for the excessive court docket, the place leaks of any variety are exceedingly rare.

The court docket shares drafts of opinions internally long before they are issued publicly, Roberts famous, calling it "a routine and essential part of the Court docket's confidential deliberative work."

The draft on this high-profile abortion case was created in February, based on Politico, which obtained the opinion.

The justices, law clerks and different workers of the courtroom are "intensely loyal to the institution and devoted to the rule of legislation," Roberts stated.

"Courtroom employees have an exemplary and necessary custom of respecting the confidentiality of the judicial course of and upholding the belief of the Courtroom. This was a singular and egregious breach of that belief that is an affront to the Courtroom and the group of public servants who work here," he said.

The publication of the draft opinion rocked Washington, triggering waves of shock and fury from Democrats who are actually pushing for Congress to right away codify abortion rights by legislation.

Republicans decried the leak itself, and lots of referred to as for the type of investigation the Roberts announced late Tuesday morning. The GOP lawmakers who commented on the draft opinion praised it for putting choices about abortion in the fingers of states instead of the federal government.

The 98-page draft opinion was penned by Justice Samuel Alito, certainly one of six conservatives on a court docket that has moved sharply to the correct within the wake of the Trump administration.

Alito's draft would toss out the precedent set by the 1973 case Roe v. Wade and reaffirmed in 1992 by Deliberate Parenthood v. Casey. Those pivotal rulings protect the proper to get an abortion earlier than the point of fetal viability and require that rules limiting abortion access do not pose an "undue burden."

Alito wrote: "We maintain that Roe and Casey have to be overruled."

The draft of the opinion of the court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Group would side with the state of Mississippi in defense of a regulation that might ban virtually all abortions after 15 weeks of being pregnant.

Lower federal courts had blocked the law on the grounds that it violates the protections established by the Roe and Casey selections.

This is breaking news. Please examine again for updates.