Supreme Court says leaked abortion draft is genuine; Roberts orders investigation into leak

Pro-abortion and anti-abortion demonstrators protest outside the U.S. Supreme Courtroom after the leak of a draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito preparing for a majority of the court to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion rights resolution later this 12 months, in Washington, U.S., Might 3, 2022. 

Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on Tuesday confirmed the authenticity of a leaked draft court opinion that will toss out longstanding abortion rights, but famous that is not the court's ultimate determination.

Roberts ordered an investigation into the leaker.

"To the extent this betrayal of the confidences of the Courtroom was supposed to undermine the integrity of our operations, it is not going to succeed," the chief justice mentioned in a press release. "The work of the Court is not going to be affected in any approach."

"I've directed the Marshal of the Courtroom to launch an investigation into the supply of the leak," Roberts mentioned.

The advance publication of a draft opinion is nearly unprecedented for the excessive court, where leaks of any variety are exceedingly uncommon.

The court docket shares drafts of opinions internally long earlier than they're issued publicly, Roberts noted, calling it "a routine and essential a part of the Court docket's confidential deliberative work."

The draft in this high-profile abortion case was created in February, according to Politico, which obtained the opinion.

The justices, law clerks and different staff of the courtroom are "intensely loyal to the institution and dedicated to the rule of regulation," Roberts stated.

"Court workers have an exemplary and vital tradition of respecting the confidentiality of the judicial process and upholding the belief of the Court docket. This was a singular and egregious breach of that trust that's an affront to the Court and the community of public servants who work right here," he said.

The publication of the draft opinion rocked Washington, triggering waves of shock and fury from Democrats who at the moment are pushing for Congress to instantly codify abortion rights via legislation.

Republicans decried the leak itself, and lots of called for the type of investigation the Roberts introduced late Tuesday morning. The GOP lawmakers who commented on the draft opinion praised it for putting decisions about abortion within the arms of states as an alternative of the federal authorities.

The 98-page draft opinion was penned by Justice Samuel Alito, one of six conservatives on a court docket that has moved sharply to the best in the wake of the Trump administration.

Alito's draft would toss out the precedent set by the 1973 case Roe v. Wade and reaffirmed in 1992 by Deliberate Parenthood v. Casey. Those pivotal rulings protect the right to get an abortion before the point of fetal viability and require that regulations limiting abortion access don't pose an "undue burden."

Alito wrote: "We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled."

The draft of the opinion of the court in Dobbs v. Jackson Ladies's Health Organization would side with the state of Mississippi in protection of a regulation that may ban virtually all abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.

Decrease federal courts had blocked the law on the grounds that it violates the protections established by the Roe and Casey selections.

This is breaking news. Please test again for updates.